Penn State discipline challenged
Students facing punishment in mini-riot say quarterback's case shows double
standard.
09/18/2000
STATE COLLEGE (AP) -- A computer engineering major at Pennsylvania State
University who helped hang a protest banner outside a National Governors
Association reception on campus faced defiant trespass charges that were
later dropped.
But Justin Leto was placed on deferred suspension by the university's
Judicial Affairs Office.
He is among several students voicing concern that the state's largest
university doles out swift punishment to some -- whether or not they are
convicted of anything in court -- while the Nittany Lions' starting
quarterback Rashard Casey faces assault charges in New Jersey and no
discipline on campus.
"We think they're going to bend over backward to find Rashard Casey innocent.
But they'll do whatever it takes to find other people guilty," Leto said.
Other critics of the university's student justice system say it rushes cases
through a process that does not ensure Fifth Amendment rights or that they
be represented by attorneys.
"The law's clear. The university can act to discipline students, and their
Fifth Amendment rights don't have to be applied when the students are going
through that disciplinary process," said Andrew Shubin, a State College
lawyer representing three students cleared of charges in connection with
hanging the banner more than two months ago.
"But that doesn't mean it's wise or fair," Shubin said.
Casey was charged May 14 with assault in an attack on an off-duty police
officer outside a bar in Hoboken, N.J. Police say Casey and another man
kicked the victim until he was unconscious. Casey denies the charges.
University spokesman William Mahon said Penn State's disciplinary system is
fair, and has received "overwhelming" approval from students who have faced
it.
"The system's a good system, in place for many years," Mahon said.
Complaints about how the university has handled Casey's case emerged when
students arrested early July 16 for what authorities called "riotous
behavior" found themselves quickly facing suspensions before their cases went
to court.
That night 28 people -- including 18 Penn State students -- were arrested
after a mini-riot near the campus at the conclusion of the annual Central
Pennsylvania Festival of the Arts.
Two years ago some 1,500 students gathered as rioters during the same festival,
and set bonfires, tore down light posts, battered storefronts and injured more
than a dozen police officers.
July's melee was smaller, with the most serious charge aggravated assault for
throwing a rock at a police officer. Most were accused of failure to disperse
and resisting arrest.
Of 11 students disciplined by Penn State for their roles in the mini-riot, five
were suspended for a year or given probation. The other six are appealing their
punishments, including suspensions.
One of those, Martin Austermuhle, is a senior majoring in international politics
who is attending Penn State on a student visa. He said he was charged with
failure to disperse, though he wasn't a rioter. His case has yet to go to court.
Penn State suspended him for a year. He could lose his visa and be sent home to
Costa Rica.
"I'm willing to take a penalty, but this indirect deportation is too much," he
told the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.
Mahon said the university met with police and viewed videotapes. "I'm not
surprised that some people facing discipline would have complaints," he said.
Others support the university's swift action, particularly in light of the riot
two years ago.
"The riot is troubling because it happened two times now, and we don't want it
becoming part of the culture," said Peter Marshall, manager of State College
Borough.